Archive for ‘humility’

September 27, 2011

Who Remembers the Forgotten

by Digital Maggid

A commentary from the Rebbe of Lublin on the line from the Machzor:

You are He who remembers all the forgotten from eternity.

The Holy Blessed one remembers what people forget and remembers not what people do not forget.

For example, when a person does a good thing and he goes around continuously bragging and he keeps incessantly telling about the good he’s done, the Master of the Universe remembers it not, because the Holy Blessed One “remembers all the forgotten” — the good that a person does and immediately forgets about. On the other hand, when a person does good and forgets about it, doesn’t talk about it to anyone, then the Holy Blessed One “remembers all the forgotten” — the Master of the Universe remembers this.

Of course, the rebbe is obviously trying to get his constituents to refrain from boasting about their good deeds. But there is another implication to this. Although the context of the prayer makes it clear that what is being talked about is a person’s deeds that are judged on Rosh Hashana, we can also apply this notion to another context. Namely, that Hashem remembers US when we feel forgotten.

It is a common Rosh Hashanah theme to point to all the many instances in Bereshit (Genesis) where the text says, “And Gd remembered so-and-so.” But it is not that Gd ever forgot the person in the first place. It is merely that that person now comes to the fore of Gd’s attention. This is a little bit like when you’re out running errands and you suddenly realize you have to go pick your kid up from school. It is certainly not the case that you for one moment forgot you had a kid. Poooh-poooh-poooh! No, it is just that your attention was elsewhere for a moment. Similarly, I think we can sometimes feel that Gd has forgotten us. But it isn’t so. Indeed, this text proves it, because if all our deeds and our attitudes about them are counted and remembered, how much moreso the individual who performs them?

June 27, 2011

Torah Lishmah (for its own sake)

by Digital Maggid

For all of us leader types and future leaders out there:

„זאת חקת התורה“ — דער עיקר לימוד התורה דארף זײַן לשמה, ניט כדי גערופענ צו בבערען „רבי“ אָדער „חכם.“ (ר’ משה’לע קאָזשעניצער)

“This is the statute” — The main thing in studying the Torah is that it must be lishmah (for its own sake), not inorder to be called “rabbi” or “sage.”
(R’ Mosheleh Kozhnitzer)

✓ COMMENTS

June 24, 2011

His Staff Flowered

by Digital Maggid

Although it is wonderful to examine and unpack these verses of Torah and to study the wisdom of our Masters’ commentaries, it is also important to look at their work (and ours) from a bit broader perspective. There is significance not only in their interpretations of verses, but also in what they chose to make comments about.

In looking through this treasury, it is surprising to note that the bulk of the commentary is devoted to the first two words of the parsha. As mentioned previously, there are 36 comments on “Korach took.” There are a few comments on the exchange between Korach and Moshe, a few about the events leading up to the gathering of the staffs, and surprisingly, only one commentary  in 44 (in this particular book) that deals with the flowering of Aaron’s staff.

By my way of thinking, the flowering of the staff should be getting much more air time. Afterall, that was the miracle that the entire parsha is there to set up. Why isn’t it more significant in the minds of our Masters? Or perhaps it was merely the choice of R’ Kirshenbaum, who compiled this collection, to focus so strongly on “Korach took” and barely mention the flowering of the staff. And on top of that, the one commentary that does deal with the flowering staff is not terribly insightful as far as I can see. So what does this say about this whole story?

In any case, we do have one commentary on the staff flowering, and this is it:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.